SEATTLE (AP) — The Washington Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously upheld a new tax on big banks aimed at providing essential services and improving the state's regressive tax system.
The 1.2% business and occupation surtax — a tax added on top of other taxes — was passed by the Legislature in 2019. It applies to banks that make more than $1 billion in annual profits, but it is assessed only on their economic activity in Washington.
The banking industry sued, saying the tax discriminated against banks engaged in interstate commerce, in violation of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the right to regulate trade among the states.
The justices ruled that the tax does not discriminate against out-of-state banks.
"It applies equally to all financial institutions meeting the $1 billion income threshold, irrespective of whether they are based inside or outside of Washington," Justice Barbara Madsen wrote.
The ruling overturned a decision last year by King County Superior Court Judge Marshall Ferguson, who found that the tax did have a discriminatory effect.
In their challenge, the Washington Banking Association and the American Banking Association noted that of the 153 financial institutions that had to pay the tax during the first quarter of 2020, 150 were based out of state. Out-of-state entities paid more than 99.7% of the $34 million collected during that period, an attorney for the groups, former Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna, told the justices during arguments in May.
But state Solicitor General Noah Purcell said that argument would lead to absurd results: If Washington couldn’t impose taxes that are written neutrally but which wind up affecting more out-of-state businesses than in-state ones, the state wouldn't be able to tax tobacco.
Lawmakers said they designed the surtax to help make the state’s taxation more progressive by targeting businesses best able to pay. Washington's middle class and poor residents pay two to six times as much of their income in taxes as the wealthy do, lawmakers found.
The case drew a friend-of-the-court brief from labor and community activists, including the Washington Black Lives Matter Alliance, who argued that the tax was a legitimate way for lawmakers to target Washington's regressive tax system.
"This unanimous decision correctly applies the law and is a win for those fighting to make Washington's tax system fairer," Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, said in an emailed statement.
The banking industry groups did not immediately issue a response to the ruling. Given the potential interstate commerce issue, they could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision.
Another effort by Democratic lawmakers to have the rich pay more in taxes — a capital gains tax due to take effect in January — is also facing a legal challenge. The measure creates a 7% tax on capital gains from stocks, bonds and other assets above $250,000, with exemptions for retirement accounts, real estate and some other assets. It’s expected to raise about $445 million a year for early learning and child care programs.
McKenna is also representing groups challenging that tax, saying it is an income tax barred by the state constitution.
- Washington Supreme Court Abolishes the Death Penalty, Calling It ‘Arbitrary’ and ‘Racially Biased"
- Death-penalty opponents cheer Washington Supreme Court ruling that struck punishment down
- Supreme Court decision will make big impact on e-commerce
- Despite Supreme Court win in tax case, Buffalo man may be looking at prison
- Washington Supreme Court tosses out state’s death penalty
- Washington Supreme Court tosses death penalty
- Gonzalez repels challenger Nathan Choi, will retain his seat on the Washington Supreme Court
- Women's rights activist named to head Ethiopia's Supreme Court in new reform
- Colorado Independent crosses first hurdle in U.S. Supreme Court case
- Rancorous, partisan start for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s Senate hearing
- West Virginia Supreme Court Tosses Challenge to Proposed Brooke County Power Plant
- News organizations across the nation back Colorado Independent’s open-records fight at US Supreme Court
- BREAKING: Kavanaugh is confirmed, Senate Oks Supreme Court nominee
- Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Vote Count: Here’s How Every Senator Voted on Supreme Court Nominee
- Meet Noel Francisco, the Conservative Supreme Court Litigator Who Could Take Over Oversight of Mueller Investigation
- Teachers Target Arizona Supreme Court Justices in Elections After Tax Ruling
- Supreme Court turns down Houston death row inmate convicted in drug deal double slaying
- Former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O'Connor reveals she has dementia
- Supreme Court decision may illuminate Ohio dark money
- Will: Daggers drawn over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
Washington Supreme Court unanimously OKs tax on big banks have 734 words, post on www.sfgate.com at September 30, 2021. This is cached page on Konitono.News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.