Climate change doesn’t just threaten the environment — in the years to come it’s also likely to worsen income inequality by cutting into the hours, and therefore the pay, of millions of retail workers, according to a new report from the Federal Reserve.
Increasingly volatile weather patterns could mean lower income for retail industry employees, who make up roughly 10% of the U.S. workforce, an analysis by Fed economist Brigitte Roth Tran found. That’s because extreme temperatures, flooding, storms and other byproducts of global warming also affect patterns of consumer spending — and even whether they go to the store at all.
That trend is likely to become more dramatic as climate change worsens, Roth Tran noted. In turn, those shifts affect retail workers, who are given fewer work hours when sales decline and more when sales increase.
“Individuals working in retail with sales-based pay or hourly wages may experience increasingly large income swings as weather becomes more variable and affects sales and hours worked,” the economist wrote. “Understanding how climate change will affect the retail sector is an important component to quantifying and adapting to the effects of climate change and also to understanding its potential implications for economic inequality.”
Low pay, unsteady hours
Retail is among the lowest-paying sectors, and employees often have little control over the number of hours they are scheduled to work. In August, the average hourly wage in the private sector was $23.59, while those in retail earned an average of $16.72 an hour, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retail employees worked an average of 30.4 hours in August, the BLS data showed, compared to 33.6 hours by private-sector workers overall.
In 2018, projections on the impact of Hurricane Florence had it costing retailers about $700 million, according to Planalytics, which offers weather-planning tools for businesses. That estimate of lost sales includes purchases that retailers and restaurants would miss and not make up, and came in addition to property and other damage caused by the hurricane.
Negating those losses somewhat would be increased sales at home-improvement retailers like Lowe’s and Home Depot.
- Who should pay for climate change damage?
- Apple’s next iPhone won’t have a home button — and that means big changes
- Paying the price of climate change
- There’s a big, stupid reason the US will probably break its climate change promise
- Low agri production, climate change increase risk of food security for 10-20 years
- Pacific faces big economic losses from climate change: ADB
- Trump’s pick for Secretary of State may be the administration’s top climate change defender — but big questions remain
- How do we pay for climate change?
- A conservative think tank has mailed a book challenging climate change to over 10,000 US science teachers
- Climate change: UK government to commit to 2050 target
- It’s ‘an expensive hoax’ — and other things Trump has said about climate change
- Al Gore explains our chances against climate change, and his fateful meeting with Donald Trump